# V2 of "Revising Developer Mining" - With Global Liquidity Mining

**URL:** <https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/v2-of-revising-developer-mining-with-global-liquidity-mining/361>\
**Category:** UMA Protocol\
**Created:** [March 20, 2021, 1:43am UTC](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/v2-of-revising-developer-mining-with-global-liquidity-mining/361 "2021-03-20T01:43:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anu](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.uma.xyz/anu/32/24_2.png) [@anu](https://discourse.uma.xyz/u/anu)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2021, 4:38pm UTC](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/v2-of-revising-developer-mining-with-global-liquidity-mining/361/5 "2021-03-20T16:38:11Z")

</div>

> [@nicholaspai](#):
>
> However, end users don’t actually trade the product.

I think the rewards system should cover all the diff use cases and not just LPing, otherwise sponsors have little reason to do more than minting and LPing:

minting and trading away the synth (shorting)  
adding liquidity without being a sponsor  
holding the synth without being a sponsor?

For non YD products, someone that bought the synth and is holding to it betting on it’s price is as much of a “UMan” as an sponsor, the system needs both.

For YD products, I would also consider delegating the LPing rewards to [curve.fi](http://curve.fi), but that’s something to discuss in another topic: [Proposal: Using curve.fi metapools for synths pegged to ERC20 tokens](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/proposal-using-curve-fi-metapools-for-synths-pegged-to-erc20-tokens/366)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/v2-of-revising-developer-mining-with-global-liquidity-mining/361)._