# ⚠️ Call for Slashing: Coordinated Bad-Faith P4 Votes After July 1 Deadline (Zelenskyy Suit Dispute)

**URL:** <https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/call-for-slashing-coordinated-bad-faith-p4-votes-after-july-1-deadline-zelenskyy-suit-dispute/2225>\
**Category:** UMA Protocol\
**Tags:** approved-for-review\
**Created:** [July 4, 2025, 6:07am UTC](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/call-for-slashing-coordinated-bad-faith-p4-votes-after-july-1-deadline-zelenskyy-suit-dispute/2225 "2025-07-04T06:07:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon3000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.uma.xyz/anon3000/32/832_2.png) [@anon3000](https://discourse.uma.xyz/u/anon3000)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2025, 6:07am UTC](https://discourse.uma.xyz/t/call-for-slashing-coordinated-bad-faith-p4-votes-after-july-1-deadline-zelenskyy-suit-dispute/2225/1 "2025-07-04T06:07:35Z")

</div>

⚠ **Early P4 Lead – Potential Bad-Faith Voting in Zelenskyy Suit Dispute**

A significant number of voters in the ongoing **Zelenskyy Suit dispute** (Polymarket) have currently voted for **P4 (“Too Early”)**, despite the fact that the **event window (July 1 deadline) has clearly passed**. While the final result is not yet confirmed, this early trend raises red flags and deserves community scrutiny.

* * *

### 🧾 Facts:

- The event (Zelenskyy wearing a suit before July) is fully over — the **July 1 deadline has passed**.
- **Timestamped, credible evidence** confirms the event occurred during the eligibility window.
- A vote for “Too Early” (P4) is **no longer factually valid** based on UMA’s resolution criteria.
- Continued support for P4 at this stage appears to be a **bad-faith tactic** to delay resolution or suppress payout.

* * *

### 🔍 Why This Matters:

A P4 majority in this vote would not reflect honest disagreement — it would indicate:

- Disregard for UMA’s resolution rules and finality windows
- Possible **coordinated manipulation**
- Abuse of P4 as a delay mechanism despite factual resolution

Even before the vote ends, this serves as a **critical opportunity** for the community to monitor, investigate, and prepare appropriate action.

* * *

### ✅ What We Urge:

If this vote **does finalize with a P4 majority** , or if the behavior continues across other markets, we call on UMA governance to:

- Conduct a **full audit** of P4 voters
- Identify **coordinated or repeat behavior**
- Prepare **slashing or removal proposals** if bad faith is confirmed
- Reaffirm publicly that these tactics are **unacceptable** and will be penalized

UMA has taken corrective action in similar past events. It is critical to **uphold the oracle’s credibility** and protect market participants from ongoing manipulation.